What’s The Difference Between A Gap Analysis And A Penetration Test?
There are various ways to test the maturity of your security program, including a gap analysis and a penetration test. However, it can be overwhelming to hear about these different types of security assessments and try to make an informed decision about what is right for your organisation and your budget. The different types of security assessments and penetration tests can have very different benefits to your organisation and may be more beneficial to more immature security programs vs. more mature security programs and vice versa.
The Difference in a Gap Analysis vs. a Penetration Test
In general, there are two approaches to a security assessment. The first is to do an interview-driven approach known as a gap analysis. This provides a holistic view of your program, from the policies and procedures to the technical controls, and identifies any gaps or potential improvements to improve the security of your organisation and the data you are trying to protect.
The second is a tactical assessment known as a penetration test. A penetration test emulates the real-world threats and attack vectors you are likely to encounter. The goal of a penetration test is to identify the weaknesses and demonstrate the impact of successful exploitation before an attacker does. In most organisations, a hybrid approach is the best way to find specific vulnerabilities now and improve processes to keep you secure moving forward.
When Should I Get a Gap Analysis?
When Should I Get a Penetration Test?
A penetration test is a great way to determine the effectiveness of your security controls at a specific point-in-time, including whether your controls could be bypassed or whether you’d detect some of the techniques an attacker is likely to use. A penetration test will provide a technical roadmap for improving security, but does not touch on the various policies, procedures, etc. that the best practice gap analysis would. We recommend a penetration test on at least an annual basis, as technology and attack vectors are constantly changing. There are various types of penetration tests to assess different perspectives and potential points of entry for attackers.
Siege Cyber specialises in both conducting gap analyses and penetration testing, so contact us if you need help completing this process or just want to better understand the approach.
Siege Cyber – Australian Leader in Penetration Testing
Take charge of your company’s security posture by addressing vulnerability issues before they become the source of a significant data breach or other cyber-attacks. Siege Cyber helps companies identify and solve security problems within their networks, systems, and other assets. Contact us today at contact@siegecyber.com.au or contact us for a free consultation with one of our penetration testers today.
When you need each one
The two are not competing purchases. They answer different questions, and buying the wrong one first is how organisations end up with a report nobody can act on.
Buy a gap analysis when the question is “where do we stand against a standard”. You are heading for ISO 27001, SOC 2, the Essential Eight or APRA CPS 234, and you need to know which controls exist, which are partial and which are missing, so you can budget and sequence the work. The output is a remediation roadmap.
Buy a penetration test when the question is “can someone actually get in”. You have built or changed something, you have controls you believe work, and you want an independent attacker’s view of whether they hold. The output is a list of exploitable findings with evidence and a retest.
A useful rule of thumb: a gap analysis tells you what you have not built yet, and a penetration test tells you whether what you built works.
A worked example
An Australian SaaS business is asked for a SOC 2 report by an enterprise prospect. They book a penetration test, because that is the security purchase they have heard of. The test comes back reasonably clean, which is encouraging, and completely fails to move them towards SOC 2, because the auditor wants evidence of access reviews, change management, vendor assessments and incident handling, none of which a penetration test examines.
Run the other way round it works. The gap analysis identifies the eighteen things standing between them and an audit, one of which is “independent security testing performed and findings remediated”. They fix the process gaps, then book the penetration test, and the test report becomes evidence in the audit rather than a separate exercise.
The order matters more than most people expect. Compliance work tells you what evidence you need to produce; testing produces one specific piece of that evidence.
Where they overlap
Both standards and regulators increasingly require testing, so the two converge at one point. ISO 27001 expects you to evaluate technical compliance. APRA CPS 234 requires systematic testing of control effectiveness, with frequency justified against the rate of change in your environment and the criticality of the assets. SOC 2 auditors routinely ask whether independent testing was performed and what happened to the findings.
That is the argument for sequencing them together rather than treating them as unrelated line items: the penetration test you were going to buy anyway can be scoped so its report satisfies the evidence requirement of the standard you are working towards.
Siege Cyber is a CREST-accredited provider of penetration testing across Australia. Siege Cyber’s CERTIFY ISO 27001 package takes Australian businesses from gap analysis to certification with a fixed scope and a fixed price. Get a Fixed-Price Quote.